A tidally locked planet orbiting a flaring m dwarf is really not very Earthy, IMHO.
Is Earth-like that much more misleading than "potentially habitable"? What do you do if editors think "habitable" too jargony?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Earth-like" needs defining. Connotations are too broad and dangerously misleading. http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2016/05/05/will-the-real-earthlike-planets-please-stand-up/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.