Patent Troll vs. NASA: Space rock smackdown as Nathan Myhrvold criticizes NEOWISE. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/asteroids-nathan-myhrvold-nasa.html?emc=edit_tnt_20160523&nlid=43097&tntemail0=y&_r=0 …
-
-
Replying to @kchangnyt
, imho, one of the best analysis is from the
@BadAstronomer: https://twitter.com/BadAstronomer/status/736233515423961088 …pic.twitter.com/Huq40LbxXF
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RicardoNSSilva @BadAstronomer
Kinda one-sided, no? Didn’t talk to Myhrvold at all it seems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @RicardoNSSilva
Clearly
@BadAstronomer shamelessly sided /w facts & is biased against he said she said 'journalism'. RIP@nytimes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Serious q: Could someone show me how NEOWISE calculated +-10% error 1 sigma? w/ numbers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
See section 3.2.2 first paragraph (page 9 bottom right) of http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/156/ …
@RicardoNSSilva@BadAstronomer2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That just says NEOWISE results are largely self-consistent between epochs, correct?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.