Curious: did you even look at that paper? Here http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.07085v4.pdf … or http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1538-3873/128/962/045004/pdf … ? Search for the word "venus".
-
LSST will find more than a few NEOs. Even the Grav/Mainzer/ Spahr paper said 60%.
Ivesic says 80%+ with optimization of the cadence. Then it's reasonable to ask cost/benefit, no?
-
-
I am sure he means 80% of those visible from the Southern sky, not 80% of all. So 80% of 50% ==> 40%. /1
-
We don’t care about asteroids far off the ecliptic, right? Those can’t hit Earth unless perihelion is right at 1 AU.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.