3. I would say an albedo of 1.0 would likely be “wildly wrong.” But can’t check independently.
I said there were instances where NEOWISE was wildly wrong. I had these albedos in mind—which of course implies diameters wrong
-
-
You said NEOWISE measured albedo ~1. Paper you pointed me to shows that is not true. See, you *could* have verified it yourself.
-
I wrote, "Al the Elder mentioned asteroids with NEOWISE albedos of ~1.0." Never said "measured."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.