1. Their own claim is error more than 10% half of the time,
Right, diameter is not measured. It is calculated from thermal models to replicate IR brightness in the 4 bands, yes?
-
-
Nothing wrong with 'better' or 'worse' thermal model as long as size is measured verifiably better. Myhrvold don't do that.
-
Nathan is claiming that the model is “good” because they came up with all these arbitrary rules for the calibration.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
YES! It is about model. Myhrvold says he has a better one when getting verifiable numbers absurdly wrong. NEOWISE paper didn't /1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
claim to have a *perfect* model, they presented their models and showed that it is in reasonable agreement with known sizes. /2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.