Update to http://bit.ly/1OAQcaa Wasn’t able to get “crewless” into the paper. It was changed to “unmanned.”http://bit.ly/1OAQcab
-
-
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt how about trying something like " remote controlled " or "robot operated"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lewis_Lab
@Lewis_Lab Those are very indirect ways of conveying the information you’re trying to convey: no people aboard. (Read the Storify.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt remote controlled is in common use--RC cars1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lewis_Lab
@Lewis_Lab You can have people on a remote-controlled rocket. It’s not like astronauts turn ignition key and step on pedal for launch.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt if you insist on thinking about it that way, maybe you can get "un-piloted" past your editors. Good luck.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Lewis_Lab You can have people on an unpiloted rocket too, just like self-driving cars.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.