1/ @DrFunkySpoon Culturally, planet means “big, important thing orbiting sun.” & thus countable like continents, oceans, siblings.
-
-
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt "dwarf planet is not a planet". Why not let them be like dwarf galaxies & stars? Minor improvement - everybody happy.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@kchangnyt Many feel there was a slight vindictiveness in adding, at last minute "dwarf p doesn't equal p". We already subdivide planets...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@kchangnyt transitions between dwarf & non-dwarf status, as happens. Under this revised scheme doesn't suddenly become or cease being planet2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon Everyone forgets Gingerich et al proposed exactly that & everyone hated that too.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt I don't think everyone hated it. Some slight tweaks were requested & process went off the rails. Have u read accounts of Prague?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon I’m referring to the public reaction. People just wanted Pluto, not to clutter the solar system.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt There was definitely some public attachment to Pluto. All the more reason not to confuse & upset people w unnecessary "demotion".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon The 8 planets is by far least confusing option. Ask people to name the 5 dwarf planets or the 6 "almost certainly" dwarfs.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt but really whether people can memorize is not a good taxonomic criterion.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DrFunkySpoon Neither is public attachment to Pluto.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.