-
-
Replying to @astrokiwi
@astrokiwi@kchangnyt Here's one stab at it that I made: http://funkyscience.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/PlanetDef_Aug.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon@astrokiwi No way to prove roundness of exoplanets, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt@astrokiwi In general not observationally. But know mass & density. Above a certain size, physics kicks in.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon@astrokiwi Then it’s a fuzzy, arbitrary mass cutoff. Something slightly smaller still roundish (e.g. Vesta).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@DrFunkySpoon@astrokiwi Composition also influences whether it can become round.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt@astrokiwi True but we often have constraints on density. What we will never know is small body population in vicinity of exos.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon@astrokiwi Any exoplanets that might not clear neighborhood? Is this semantics? Can’t detect exo-Pluto or eco-Ceres, right?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt@astrokiwi I don't think we can know w/out knowing what's in neighborhood. Earth was "dwarf" until after late heavy bombardment..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon
@DrFunkySpoon@astrokiwi It’s arbitrary one way or the other. Neither is stupid arbitrary.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DrFunkySpoon @astrokiwi Carving out a historical exemption for Pluto would be example of stupid arbitrary.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.