Here are some facts to ponder: New Horizons and Dawn performed their second optical navigation campaigns in the same week. (1/3)
-
-
Replying to @elakdawalla
New Horizons' camera has 19x stronger magnification than Dawn's. (2/3)
1 reply 8 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @elakdawalla
But New Horizons will not get pictures of Pluto as good as the pics Dawn just returned of Ceres until just 2 weeks before its flyby. (3/3)
5 replies 15 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @elakdawalla
@elakdawalla It's not camera magnification that's most striking- NH is 1.33 AU from Pluto, Dawn`s much closer to Ceres than Moon is to Earth1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cephalopernicus
@cephalopernicus True! I find that most people don't really get the difference between 300 thousand and 300 million km, they're both "big".1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elakdawalla
@elakdawalla I never start the conversation in km, not in the US! I think Earth-Sun distance and Earth-Moon distance frame it well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cephalopernicus
Cool --
@cephalopernicus just pointed out to me that Dawn is near Earth-Moon distance from Ceres, while NH near Earth-Sun dist from Pluto.4 replies 33 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @elakdawalla
@elakdawalla Also, if we swapped spacecraft (and their speeds) right now, New Horizons would reach Ceres in less than four hours.4 replies 9 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @cephalopernicus
@cephalopernicus@elakdawalla And Dawn would get to Pluto when?!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
@kchangnyt@elakdawalla If dropped @ NH's current position it would take... 52 years? Using Dawn's velocity relative to Ceres of 0.12 km/s.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@cephalopernicus @elakdawalla and then Pluto wouldn’t be there any more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.