Ah I thought they meant 13,000 globally, as the total number of fatalities from coronavirus is still under that.
A linear infection rate doesn't make biological sense. Testing hasn't been increasing linearly either. And I don't see anything suggesting sublinear in the US data (on the log graf). I've been waiting anxiously for that. You're good w/ numbers. Show me.
-
-
The log graph is clearly sublinear, yes? That means the original graph is sub-exponential.
-
Though again, the human eye isn't great at analyzing graphs objectively. And you're right. An infection doesn't grow linearly. It grows logistically.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.