love it when the nytimes journalist just runs with the nonsense about 20th century history spouted by the mathematicians he interviewshttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/science/abel-prize-mathematics.html …
-
Show this thread
-
.
@kchangnyt next time you need someone to fact-check your history of probability (or your history of major math prizes -- though fewer howlers in your article on that score), look me up2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MBarany
Not sure what you're complaining about. Furstenberg's and Margulis's work obviously is not probability theory.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @MBarany
Ah, great. The usual bullshit deflection you get from a journalist when even mildly criticising them…
#Journalism1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn @MBarany
No problem with receiving criticism but just saying everything wrong without citing anything in particular isn't helpful.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @MBarany
Oh, but of course
@MBarany didn’t say anything remotely like “everything wrong”. He specifically pointed to the bit touching on the history of probability. And anyone who is actually interested in criticism wld simply ask for clarification—instead of knee-jerk deflection.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I wrote "Not sure what you're complaining about. Furstenberg's and Margulis's work obviously is not probability theory." How is that not asking for clarification?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.