love it when the nytimes journalist just runs with the nonsense about 20th century history spouted by the mathematicians he interviewshttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/science/abel-prize-mathematics.html …
Not sure what you're complaining about. Furstenberg's and Margulis's work obviously is not probability theory.
-
-
then what was the point of that section from Labourie completely misrepresenting the place of probability in mid-20th century math?
-
if you meant that as context for using probabilistic methods in dynamical systems, that's an approach with a rich earlier tradition dating at least to Poincaré in the late 19th century https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~david.aubin/publis/2002a.pdf …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.