If there were a rule that 2(4) had priority in the order of operations, would it make the calculation more interesting? No. No one writes the equation in this form, because it’s ambiguous. Write as a fraction, and there’s no ambiguity, and that’s a better option in every way.
-
-
There is no ambiguity about this. Just a lot of people who don’t know the rules.
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Why should you have to remember stupid rules for a simple calculation like this? If you meant 8 — (2 + 2) 2 that’s what you should have written. The other form is just meant as a gotcha by being intentionally ambiguous.
5 replies 0 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @DaveBarber78 and
Why bother to spell things correctly? Why bother to use proper grammar? Any of those can be called arbitrary, stupid rules. There's no real absolute reason to do anything one way or the other than to simplify communication, and the same goes for PEMDAS.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @burnowt @kchangnyt and
We put people on the moon with PEMDAS. We created artificial intelligence with PEMDAS. It’s more important that anyone seems to understand.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveBarber78 @burnowt and
“We go to the moon not because it is easy but because we have been drilled in PEMDAS! We will do this and all the other things like 8 ÷ 2(2+2) = ?”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @burnowt and
Never said it was a pretty math problem, or that any professional should ever write an expression like that. Just that there is still only one solution, when written in one line like it is. No matter how confused people are about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveBarber78 @burnowt and
If it’s pointless and useless, the answer to a “gotcha” question does not matter. You have your own blind assumptions, namely that all that matters is how it translates into a single line of computer code.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @DaveBarber78 and
You know, is it customary now in
@nytscience to open an article talking about common ignorance and misconceptions, and besides NOT informing or clarifying what those are, to actively insult people for their interest? Mr. Chang has tweeted and snarked a lot and said nothing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @burnowt @kchangnyt and
Because there are tons of conventions I follow for written language whether it's spelling, grammar, or math, that I totally admit I know nothing about WHY they are that way. Mr. Chang has repeatedly derided us for not knowing WHY and not done anything to explain WHY.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If you want to learn about order of operations (and hopefully you did learn about that in elementary school), the Wikipedia article should give you a start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.