If you thought 8 ÷ 2(2+2) = ? was stupid and pointless, so did a lot of mathematicians.https://nyti.ms/2YKDk9f
-
-
Replying to @kchangnyt @nytimes
It's not a question for mathematicians: there is no math in it, only elementary-school level arithmetics. The answer is 16. If it were 8÷(2(2+2)) then the answer would be 1. Yes, it's that simple.
7 replies 3 retweets 56 likes -
If there were a rule that 2(4) had priority in the order of operations, would it make the calculation more interesting? No. No one writes the equation in this form, because it’s ambiguous. Write as a fraction, and there’s no ambiguity, and that’s a better option in every way.
6 replies 0 retweets 31 likes -
There is no ambiguity about this. Just a lot of people who don’t know the rules.
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @DaveBarber78 @kchangnyt and
There is indeed ambiguity, caused by the ÷ sign. It's why that symbol isn't used in real equations. The ÷ makes it unclear whether the dividend is 2 or 2(2+2). Also, you shouldn't divide yet if parentheses still exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SarcasticBrocc1 @kchangnyt and
Nope. There are no parentheses around the 2(2+2). Multiplication and division are applied as a group from left to right in order after exponents and parenthetical statements are resolved. Not ambiguous in the least. The rules are complete and simple.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DaveBarber78 @kchangnyt and
Okay, I guess my math degree is different from yours then.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SarcasticBrocc1 @kchangnyt and
I don’t know where you got your math degree, and this is the first thing I found on google, not some scholarly source, but this is how I was taught. It works with every programming language I’ve ever tested it with as well as CNC machines that I program daily.pic.twitter.com/BDQlXuj1YQ
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveBarber78 @SarcasticBrocc1 and
If you’ve got another version of these rules, I would love to see it. Not even being sarcastic. If I’m wrong, I’d love to know what is right and why.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Steven Strogatz (aka a Real Mathematician) explains in detail:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/science/math-equation-pemdas-bodmas.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.