You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Back in 2015, a bunch of us @DrFunkySpoon @drspacejunk @OmanReagan & more discussed alternatives to "unmanned." http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2015/10050900-finding-new-language.html …
Just today, I found that that Twitter conversation led to "crewless" (suggested by @astrokiwi) making it into the NYT stylebook:pic.twitter.com/KO76kofsFr
In related news, today @NASA themselves used "mankind" (thereby going against their own style guide). I wonder if they're reverting to gendered languages to please current administrationhttps://twitter.com/NASA/status/1152186589646413824 …
My guess is that someone, possibly new, did that without thinking, without malintent, without knowing. That is why it’s good to keep talking about this.
IDK, to me "crewless" implies that it could be crewed, but isn't.
The same can be said of unmanned and uncrewed.
That’s really great Kenneth. Thanks for letting us know. It’s interesting to see how the system responds...
Good result!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
