A couple of scoops in here. NASA admin Bridenstine did talk to Trump about moon and Mars. And Bridenstine thinks NASA will need < $20B to get to the moon in 2024.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/science/nasa-moon-apollo-artemis.html …
-
-
Context: a couple of weeks earlier, Bridenstine told CNN that NASA would need $20 billion to $30 billion added to its budget to pull off a 2024 moon landing.https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/13/tech/nasa-budget-moon-mission-artemis/index.html …
Show this thread -
By the way, wrapped about the scoops is a nice article about how everyone wants to go to the moon now after 30 years of no one caring at all.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/science/nasa-moon-apollo-artemis.html …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We're going to need a new estimate for Mars though
-
The Martians will pay for it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The only justification to go back to the Moon would be a mission to assess the possibility of exploitation of the huge reserves of Helium 3 , 3He or He3 in the Moon plains that could save mankind. https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Preparing_for_the_Future/Space_for_Earth/Energy/Helium-3_mining_on_the_lunar_surface …
-
Resources are a big factor as well as prime real estate spots . C3Ipic.twitter.com/DcC0ZyxCPi
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's Much cheaper contact isro
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ending the Apollo program was a huge mistake. Why were Apollo 18, 19, and 20 canceled when we already had them ready to go?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.