Still no subsurface Martian cows. But otherwise, the story of methane on the red planet gets more interesting.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/01/science/mars-methane-gas.html …
-
-
-
Replying to @Maurissone
Yes, there are greenhouse gases on Mars too. As well as 800-degree-F Venus. That's pretty good confirmation that pumping CO2 into the atmosphere causes global warming.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kchangnyt
So...The CO2 on Mars and it's temperature inflation prove that global climate changes could came from natural phenomenon. This conclusion is based on astronomical observation. Isn't it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maurissone
Obviously, natural phenomena can cause global climate change. It does not follow all global climate change is caused by natural phenomena, and basically everyone (even the deniers) agree that the rising CO2 is not natural.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kchangnyt
The present global warming theory fails to prove some events, like medieval warming period and interglacials. Superimposed phenomenons (CO2 emissions and astronomical effects) are not taken in account.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maurissone
That's like complaining about Newton's laws of motion because they don't take quantum mechanics into account and fail to explain the motion of photons.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
This comparison is absolutely out of scale. It's more similar to consider only lunar effects and ignore the influence of sun over the ocean waves. Temperature measurements have bias due to urban heat island. This data feeds a global model! This is far from quantum analogy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maurissone
Climate is complicated, but not _that_ complicated. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Dump greenhouse gases into an atmosphere, temperatures should rise. It would be remarkable if temperatures _didn't_ rise. Sun, urban heat island, etc. have been taken into account.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt
No, they are not been take in account properly. Global climate is much more complicated than engaged science thinks.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You should publish your results then.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.