The headline in the tweet is plainly false however.
-
-
The headline is “Life on Mars? Rover’s Latest Discovery Puts It ‘On the Table’”. That’s not false.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The headline in the tweet says that curiosity discovered molecules produced by living organisms.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Organic molecules are produced by living organisms. Curiosity discovered organic molecules. I agree that if all you read are tweets, you’ll have a misleading, incomplete picture of the news. That’s why I write 1,100-word articles.
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Some organic molecules are produced by living organisms. Not all. I appreciate your work on the article but whoever wrote the tweet did you and the discovery a disservice by writing something that wasn’t true.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @sebastian_byron @kchangnyt and
Indeed, if you look at the other comments on the tweet you’ll see peoples’ reactions are either “oh they found life” or “oh this is false”
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sebastian_byron @kchangnyt and
The tweet should have had a “possibly” after molecules (or another analogous formulation)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @LucaPlanets @sebastian_byron and
Simple, effective, elegant solution :)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MelmothMostoles @LucaPlanets and
1/I wrote the article, not the tweet. (A variation on reporters disclaiming, “I don’t write the headlines.”) That’s an odd defense since the tweet is, verbatim, the first sentence of the article.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @MelmothMostoles and
2/Context matters. Next sentence: “That does not prove that life has ever existed on Mars.” I think most everyone reading the second paragraph can figure out what I meant in the first sentence.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
3/Maybe lots of people hate the article too, but as far as I know, no one has slagged me about it being wrong/misleading/bad. It’s the tweet people object to.
-
-
Replying to @kchangnyt @MelmothMostoles and
Kenneth Chang Retweeted Kenneth Chang
4/I understand what everyone is saying. I wouldn’t have sent out that tweet. I know this, because this is what I personally tweeted about my story:https://twitter.com/kchangnyt/status/1004807028945104896 …
Kenneth Chang added,
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kchangnyt @MelmothMostoles and
5/The tweet needed more context, e.g. “Scientists for the first time have confidently identified on Mars a collection of carbon molecules that are, at least on Earth, used and produced by living organisms.”
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.