Gloria Steinem weighs in: "The question is whether Biden would use the same words to describe a male professor — and I suspect he would. The larger problem is that they’re about style, not content.”https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/10/us/politics/joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-sexist.html …
-
-
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
1 thing to watch as Biden camp criticizes Warren style:extent to which Biden himself uses personal language. he's used terms like "elitist attitude""condescending" approach in statement,on radio,in$appeal..when asked about it by reporters,doesn't go therehttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/10/us/politics/joe-biden-sexist-elizabeth-warren.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage …
Diesen Thread anzeigen
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Man, Biden seems just bound and determned to lose the goodwill he had going in. In the midst of our current nightmare, any candidate spending time and energy attacking another isn't going to sit well. People need to hear what THEY are going to do to end the atrocities & rebuild.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
Warren deserves pushback when she comes after him. She can dish it out but then cries wolf. Hillary slayed her critics. Joe should, too.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
It’s almost like people have forgotten that Warren started this whole thing by calling Biden a Republican and Biden only then spoke up to defend himself.
-
our story reminds readers of the chronology of this clash
- 2 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
A powerful man criticizing a powerful woman isn't inherently sexist. Criticisms of Biden's gaffes aren't inherently ageist. I prefer Klobuchar or Buttigieg to either of these two; that doesn't mean I'm a sexist or ageist.
-
The word police are undermining the left. Men and women get angry. People of all races can be articulate -- or not. All kinds of people commit gaffes. Focus on issues, integrity, leadership, transparency and quit fighting the use of gender-specific pronouns, for God's sake.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Warren's plan doesn't add up. It's been studied by experts. She can't defend it. Described as using gimmicks to fund it. Calling everyone Republican or sexist doesn't defend shoddy funding. It won't pass anyway because even Democrats won't vote for it.pic.twitter.com/4DorLnKwwe
- Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.