It doesn't matter if you can justify the $1400 amount with fine print. People went to the polls to vote bc they were promised $2000 checks. Democrats are either going to be the party that gave people $2000 or the party that found a fine print way to keep starving people.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Americans love 8th-grade word problems, what better model to use for campaign slogans.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s the most easily winnable thing like Trump and Republicans failing to do something about Covid. These same people will argue again in the midterms about the necessity of voting when there’s no point when the elect don’t do the shit they say. That’s why people hate politicians
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just want to know what the moral justification for this is. We know the (very dumb) math excuse, and arguing back on that is letting them off easy. How do they justify paying people a single month's rent with (maybe) necessities.
-
Republicans would give you NOTHING if they were in charge. It wouldn’t even be a debate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
A “betrayal” of $600. Mind toning down the rhetoric lest anyone think we’re being as hyperbolic as those on the right?
-
Mind toning down the privilege that downplays the value of $600 for folks that are making heartbreaking financial decisions right now?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.