.@Lyft apparently has $30 million to spend on a harmful ballot measure that would deny their drivers basic protections, yet they don't have enough money to retain the same drivers they're trying to screw over? Make it make sense. #SickofGigGreedhttps://twitter.com/kateconger/status/1255526352813535232 …
-
-
Antwort an @CaliforniaLabor @lyft
They put the money into the ballot initiative already, so can't really un-cash that particular check. The employees being laid off today are not drivers (Lyft still classifies drivers as contractors and has not employed them).
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 2 Gefällt mir -
When a company commits dollars to a lobbying campaign, do they have to spend all of it or could they take it back to pay their workers if they encounter financial difficulties?
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
In this case, they hired an external lobbying firm (shared by the other gig companies involved in the initiative) and paid their contributions already. It's not a line item in an internal budget that they can re-allocate.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir
*If* all the companies agreed to pull the ballot initiative, there may be a discussion about how to send back unspent funds. I have no reporting to suggest they will pull it, though.
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.
Say hi: DM or kate.conger@nytimes.com.