Kate Shaw

@kateashaw1

Law Professor . Supreme Court contributor . Cohost podcast. Former Obama WH lawyer. Chicagoan in Brooklyn.

Brooklyn, NY
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @kateashaw1

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @kateashaw1

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    10. ožu 2019.

    “Especially competent law clerk” is 100% going on my tombstone

    Poništi
  2. 31. sij

    Sounds from like the Johnson / Chase precedent is all that’s out there on ties in impeachment

    Poništi
  3. 31. sij

    Ok, so Chief Justice Chase broke ties in the Johnson trial; Rehnquist broke none in Clinton, but none to break. Anyone know offhand whether there have been any ties in non-presidential impeachment trials, and if so how they were handled?

    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    Very good op-ed argues it’s critical that at least some GOP Senators explicitly disavow the extreme constitutional arguments made by the President’s team during the Q & A-e.g. that abuse of power can’t be impeachable; that electoral self-interest=national interest

    Poništi
  5. 30. sij

    I think it’s fair to assume Eric Herschmann didn’t read my op-ed

    Poništi
  6. 28. sij

    It is such a pleasure to listen to an episode of ⁦⁩ I’m not on and just enjoy. Y’all rock ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Today: Continuing our coverage of President Trump's impeachment trial. Will the claims from John Bolton's book prompt Republicans to vote for new witnesses? and join us.

    Poništi
  8. 28. sij

    Some thoughts in the on the rhetoric of the impeachment trial

    Poništi
  9. 27. sij

    Wow the contributor lineup for this special joint law review issue is 🔥🔥🔥

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    TFW it’s your 65th birthday and the ladies of release a new episode in your honor. Happy Birthday, Mr Chief Justice! We hope you like the new episode!

    Poništi
  11. 25. sij

    Senate rule mavens: the Dems could in theory raise objections today, right? (There were definitely objections during the Johnson and Clinton trials...but interesting that there were none during the Managers’ presentation this week)

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    TFW and are unavailable and you and get the pod all to yourselves. What hijinks will ensue??? Spoiler alert: We were enforcing the VRA like it was no big thang! New episode coming your way!

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    .: Trump legal team "trying to figure out how they're going to respond to what was a pretty powerful presentation today...They don't, at least as I read it, fully know what their legal theory's going to be yet.

    Poništi
  15. 22. sij

    Starting in a new minutes!@ProfMMurray⁩ ⁦

    Poništi
  16. 22. sij

    Will be at Yale Law School tonight (Roe’s anniversary), for this book event with , Reva Siegel, Doug NeJaime, & —come say hi!

    Poništi
  17. 21. sij

    Both this change and the timing change - opening arguments will now be made over 3 days, not 2 - seem like important concessions by McConnell out of the gate

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    ⁩ special report coming soon as the Trial resumes⁦⁩ leads coverage with ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦@TerryMoran@⁦⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Last week & hosted the first live podcast in Jeffries Hall. The episode is now online! Listen in as & recap another busy week from the Supreme Court.

    Poništi
  20. 21. sij

    Seems significant that Dershowitz concedes that his view--that impeachment is reserved for actual crimes--is a serious outlier: "The fact that other scholars disagree, that’s for the Senate to consider.... most of the scholars disagree with me. I think they’re wrong.”

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    tfw the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny -- and very first LIVE SHOW! -- drops! thanks again to our wonderful hosts

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·