You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I did a few Twitter polls and asked the same question a bunch of different ways. Keep in mind my followers are various kinds quantitative methodologists (data scientists, epidemiologists, statistics etc).
Adjusting for nonresponders: 83% (162 people) felt that there could be information in "numerical evidence that is not detectable via statistics"https://twitter.com/kareem_carr/status/1142482353710870528 …
73% (166 people) felt that even when a statistical analysis found no evidence for a belief based on results of a study, a subject matter expert could be correct in concluding that the study supported the belief.https://twitter.com/kareem_carr/status/1142441134192517120 …
44% (166 people) felt that the interpretation of data was much more than just using statistics.https://twitter.com/kareem_carr/status/1142072485225082886 …
This isn't my view, but I have to respect it. This might be why statisticians aren't getting the last word on the validity of a statistical analysis even when the analysis isn't done using the best statistical approach. I have thoughts, but curious to hear yours first.pic.twitter.com/xCCKmrFpBy
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
