Javier Benítez, MD / Pr(Dz | Data) ≠ Pr(Data | Dz)

@jvrbntz

“One of our main objects should be to impress on the student that the clinician must reason for himself in a scientific fashion.”—Thayer (1932)

Pineal gland ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
jvrbntz.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2011.
8.303 fotografije ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @jvrbntz

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @jvrbntz

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    7. lip 2016.

    18 proslijeđenih tweetova 39 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. prije 1 sat

    What is it that distinguishes science from other practices that pretend to be scientific? It’s not peer-review, publications, authority, reputation, personality, institution.

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij

    Many people have distorted and will continue to distort the scientific method and its products in order to support their main agenda. If you are not trained about how science works you will not notice this & will adopt just-so stories that do not represent how nature works.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. prije 10 sati

    Yup, much of medical training is not scientific and it doesn’t teach critical thinking and how science works; it’s based on ritualistic dogmatic practices and beliefs we’re discouraged from questioning.

    “there was never really a moment when everyone stopped to ask what residency edu should be. […] Though there have been attempts along the way, we’ve mainly just made it up as we’ve gone along, with individual groups looking out for their own interests.”
    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. prije 12 sati

    This is well said and it’s an important point to address about scientific reasoning and statistical thinking. The average is an essential and useful statistical concept that gets misunderstood and misapplied quite often by many professionals, including those in medical practice.

    Medical research shows and reports results for “an average patient”. However, the average patient is a fictional character. The everage patient does NOT exist.
    2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. prije 13 sati

    Does medical education teach the psychology of decision-making under uncertainty? No What kind of inferences do you think we draw from this neglect in our training?

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. prije 15 sati

    Pretty interesting stuff Gerd Gigerenzer has to say about the psychology of physician practice in this EconTalk podcast. I wonder if those who cite him often in support of “gut” feeling will also cite what he says in this podcast 🤔

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Are people practicing and teaching medicine as a nonscience? You betcha! What’s their excuse about how they teach and practice medicine? See David Sackett I wonder how many are not aware they’re not practicing & teaching medicine as a science, and how many don’t even care 🤔

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. 2. velj

    The uncertainty of knowledge

    Conservative versus Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax | NEJM This is a very interesting study with a provocative result which may change (my) practice.
    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. 2. velj

    “Generational archetypes such as that of the “Millennial learner” are myths that perpetuate unfounded generalisations about cohorts, reinforce power differentials between age groups, and minimise the unique needs of individuals.“ MedEd is full of myths

    There’s no such thing as a millennial learner. Learning is not a generational thing.
    2 proslijeđena tweeta 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. 2. velj

    “What is worse… is the adverse effect that abandoning clear thinking & clear writing has on teaching & culture. Stdnts learn to repeat & to embellish discourses tht they only barely undrstnd. They can even, if they are lucky, make an academic career out of it…”—Sokal & Bricmont

    Odgovor korisniku/ci @jvrbntz
    I know you often refer to medical students but the critical scientific education you mentioning is seldomly provided to natural scientists as well.
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    “The current research culture is characterized by significant pressure to present research projects as conclusive narratives that leave no room for ambiguity or for conflicting or inconclusive results.”

    1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 2. velj

    Have you been trained to parrot things w/o knowing the evidence & statistics of what you’re saying & doing? "If we teach only the findings & products of science without its critical method, how can [someone] distinguish science from pseudoscience?"—Sagan

    1 reply 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 2. velj

    “there was never really a moment when everyone stopped to ask what residency edu should be. […] Though there have been attempts along the way, we’ve mainly just made it up as we’ve gone along, with individual groups looking out for their own interests.”

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. 2. velj

    Medicine should be practiced as a science, so many times it isn’t. There are many reasons why it’s not practiced as a science, and that has to do w plain ignorance, willful ignorance, and incentives. Regurgitation of research products does not imply practice of scientific method.

    Is medicine a science?
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    Dogmatism is not a specific content, dogmatism is the way professionals teach and assess content.

    Challenging medical dogma: we used to think that if a person had a collapsed lung (spontaneous pneumothorax) they had to get a chest tube inserted. Until today:
    Poništi
  17. 1. velj

    Why do you think people do not have the courage and integrity to tell the world the emperor has no clothes? The immediate two reasons I can think of are: 1. Incentives 2. Pluralistic ignorance

    “It’s not just that the emperor has no clothes, it’s more like the emperor has been standing in the public square for fifteen years screaming, I’m naked! I’m naked! Look at me! And the scientific establishment is like, Wow, what a beautiful outfit.”
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    ⚠️ Not all arguments/critiques against science are valid. And not everyone who claims to follow scientific practices does so. Science continues to be our most successful method of understanding how nature works, but it will also be distorted, misunderstood, & misapplied by many.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 1. velj

    Those who only disseminate research products are not disseminating science. "If we teach only the findings and products of science without its critical method, how can [someone] distinguish science from pseudoscience?"—Carl Sagan

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    It’s all 0’s and 1’s

    1 proslijeđeni tweet
    Poništi
  21. 1. velj

    Thanks. I’m not here for the likes, retweets, or replies. I know there’s lots of professional, not just on social media, who claim to produce and disseminate scientific work, but they’re really not. I’m here because there are unpleasant truths that need to be acknowledged.

    2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@jvrbntz još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·