Here's some napkin math: If you take every other location and sum exit_value/num_exits, you get 6.8B per exit. Take Facebook out of the exit pool cause they're an outlier gives us 405B / 6.8B per exit for a total of 60 exits, which is still 4x the next largest location.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
As most people said, it would be a lot cooler to run the numbers on a time adjusted scale and look at the derivative value. I think San Francisco will still come out ahead by a significant margin, but I'm also not going to run that math so YMMV.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Why does this say 20+ instead of just giving us the actual number?

-
Seems like
@micahstubbs stopped counting when he got to companies with below 9B in market cap.https://twitter.com/micahstubbs/status/1197698187944873984 …
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Wow; I’m not a fan of earthquakes-can’t plan for them, as you do for other natural disasters- but data matters. Those are strong numbers for a compelling case to brace for the unexpected ground shaking.
-
I've accepted my fate. If the big one hits; it's been a pleasure ladies, gents, and everybody in between.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Shouldn't you be looking at velocity instead
-
Definitely should be. The derivative is almost always more interesting than the value itself. Not my data tho
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is a lagging, not leading indicator.
-
Totally. I'd love to see the Delta's in the last 10 years (
@josephflaherty ?). It's still pretty compelling evidence none the less. - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

, that is)