I cannot understand how this tweet, of all tweets by recent PRESIDENTial candidates, is the one that's got you riled up.
-
-
-
I'm sure I could make a series out of it. Or feel free to take it over.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Actually,
@berniesanders *undercounted* as Federal Reserve data shows $456.9B in loans to JP Morgan Chase. The winner was@Citi at $2.6T. http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_698.pdf pic.twitter.com/G8GreZPp7m
-
To oversimplify: Repo money is not the same as TARP, banks loan trillions collectively each day just doing this, it’s not the same as normal lending. It’s providing liquidity Lots of nuance to this, but that chart is not bailout money by any stretch
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@justindross We're living in a world where upcoming founders say bullshit in a extremely complicated political landscape. I certainly won't be using@Opendoor to fuel this entitled co-founder. Grossly understating the role of our federal reserve and taxpayers. -
With the exception of the last bullet (which is subjective), I'm not sure which part of my tweet you're disagreeing with? I'm also not sure which part displays entitlement, though I'm open to being wrong and learning here if you'd share
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
He's obviously way off on the number, but youre painting a picture that JP Morgan didnt need any of this and would have come out unscathed. It cant be both that JP Morgan didnt need it and it also it helped to prevent a depression. They would have been hurt without full bailout.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
So should Twitter (and FB) fact check politicians with massive reach or nah
-
Still no, but damn this one hurts
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.