> Look to smaller more nimble Linux distributions that start shipping memory safe code; Do know of any doing this?
I wrote a blog post about how fuzz testing is making memory unsafe languages untenablehttps://www.cloudatomiclab.com/fuzz/
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Can you please show a line graph of CVE assignments, by year, based on fuzzing? To support your claim that "We can see the knock on effect on the rate of CVEs being reported." Also, please 'show your work' to list out the CVE IDs that are a result of fuzzing.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
There are no memory-unsafe languages, only memory-unsafe implementations of languages with UB. Memory-safe C is looking doable at ~2x CPU even before major cleverness. Not bad compared with many "modern" languages. Problem: perf regression is culturally verboten.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Great post
Also there's an issue, I assume "NASI C" should be "ANSI C" -
The evil twin NASI C....
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.