You were saying?pic.twitter.com/KfE3JeaSrv
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Can I get one of these?
I mean, you have to pay me. This is capitalism.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ This is my most popular order by farpic.twitter.com/a3tDdgfDBA
For obvious reasons. Etsy? E-bay? Or direct?
Mr. Amash,
#GetAWarrant ?
As a constituent of Michigan familiar with your agenda?
I am seriously hoping in this case we are finally on the same page.
Be a force for good, not evil....Come to the Blue Side.#BlueWave2018
His agenda makes it clear he’s a libertarian, not a leftist. Democrat economic policy is not in his favor(like trillion dollar stimuli)
A girl can still dream John...
Yes, I know Mr. Amash is a Libertarian. Too Bad.
The Supreme Court ruled over 40 years ago (US v Miller, 1976) that the privacy bank/financial records are not protected under the 4th Amendment, eliminating the need for warrants
There were subpoenas in that case, and the records existed, whereas with #FATCA there are no subpoenas, and the records have to be constructed.
I'm also uncertain that the reasoning behind the 3rd party doctrine can be said to apply to other countries and cultures where there may well be a very different expectation of privacy.
Of course. But how is this relevant in the current context?
Removing choice of interacting with a business fundamentally changes what the expectations of privacy are with respect to the government access to those records created by that business.
It is much of the substance of the plaintiff’s argument in Carpenter v US http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/16-402-cert-petition.pdf …
Even the bar in that case is much higher than #FATCA, which meets none of specific, articulable, or criminal criteria required.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.