Where were you when Obama's NSA was violating the same amendment?http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/29/court-criticizes-obama-admin-for-illegal-spying-on-u-s-citizens/ …
-
-
-
you aren't very smart, are you?
-
Doesn't seem so, does it?
-
no, it does not.
-
Basic rule of the internet: if you try to cite Breitbart or InfoWars as a credible news sources, it means you've already lost the argument.

-
accurate
-
Obama never exceeded his Constitutional Executive Order
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/jun/29/bob-goodlatte/gop-leader-supreme-court-has-ruled-13-times-obama-/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The bill of Rights and the 14nth amendment abrogate all previous portions of the constitution inconsistent with the amendments, yes?
-
That's an interesting theory. As the author notes, it's never been tested to challenge the legitimacy of a pardon. /1
-
But it does provide a basis for viewing such a pardon as an abuse of power & a failure to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. /2
-
That of course is a basis for impeachment. That may be the only remedy here, for who has standing to challenge the pardon? /3
-
Who could claim that they'd suffered a particularized injury from the pardon (as opposed to the racial profiling). /4
-
One thing worth noting: acceptance of a pardon is generally considered an admission of guilt. The people who were unlawfully detained >> /5
-
>>might be able to use that in a civil lawsuit against Arpaio seeking damages for Arpaio's "constitutional tort." /6
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nixon pardoned a war criminal..
@SenJohnMcCain..#Obama pardoned#ChelseaManning.. Save it, please.#Arpaio was innocent, being railroaded.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gee if only you were in a position to do something about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, it's a pardon of a a Obama hit job.
-
Well, we have a process to deal with that. Courts, appellate process, let the law rule. Arpaio is no victim. He has victimized many.
-
He victimized no one, he protected the citizens of his county. He did what the feds wouldn't.
-
He botched hundreds of sex crimes against CHILDREN while focusing on self-promotionhttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/cops-toughest-sheriff-botched-sex-crime-cases/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.