@justinamash You r NO Republican. U fight our president's agenda, bad mouth him, yet u vote 4 this BS? NO surprise.http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/14/these-are-the-24-republicans-who-think-the-pentagon-should-pay-for-transgender-surgeries/ …
-
-
Yeah, it's "modest" when WE, not you, have to foot the bill for UNNECESSARY medical treatment rather than blown-off limbs, etc. Abominable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it was so reasonable, why would only 24 of you go along. A "reasonable request" from the admin would keep it from even getting a vote.
-
It nearly didn't get a vote bc of pushback from administration. Why only 24? Bc Congress does what's politically expedient, not what's best.
-
Exactly. At least you admit it's not what's right, but expedient. Like voting against Kate's Law was politically expedient, I guess?
-
No. Voting for this amendment is politically expedient. Voting for Kate's Law is politically expedient. The right thing is voting against.
-
I was wondering the situation cause there's been a lot of talk about ur voting on Kate's law. A lot of bashing u & I don't know what to say
-
When you find out reason he was only one who voted against it, please let me know. I get DemocRATS. Their base are illegals and criminals.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.