@justinamash I'm really going to need you to explain this. The rest I'd expect, but not you.
http://thetruthdivision.com/2017/07/spread-24-republicans-voted-yes-taxpayers-funding-transgender-surgeries/ …
-
-
Okay but what about this one? Do you think taxpayers should pay for military members' sex transitions? http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/14/these-are-the-24-republicans-who-think-the-pentagon-should-pay-for-transgender-surgeries/ …
-
Still a fake news headline. People voted no for many possible reasons. I'll wait for Sec. Mattis to assess feasibility & present his policy.
-
Fair enough.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So you want it to pass so someone else can block it? Is that the strategy? I guess i don't understand.
-
I think it sounds like he's voting as someone who may have served. ya know, representing his constituents instead of just party.
-
Still fails to explain his position. Sounds like fence sitting and fear of SJWs
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You should do a promoted tweet explaining it, seems like. Maybe preempt some of this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Congressman, I don't agree with you on much but your votes in this and then bogus
#kateslaw show your commitment to the constitution.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when do u care about siding with the White House? U didn't want to side with them when you voted against Kate's Law. Not fooling me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.