I don't know about that. Where are these rights for everyone else? Surely God doesn't just care about American freedom.
-
-
-
You have misread or misinterpreted my words. The point is that rights are inherent to all human beings.
-
Even gays? Yay! So your on board with marriage equally?
-
That is awesome! Thank you!
-
The correct response is that marriage, whether straight or gay, is no business of the govt. You can define 'marriage' however you want.
-
There is no such thing as a 'right to marriage' for either gay or straight people except that people are free to form relationships.
-
It is a negative right, meaning the right to be left alone, not a positive right, meaning everyone must respect and agree with definition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We need more people like
@AP4Liberty in there that understand that. Have you seen how his Senate run is going? http://abcstlouis.com/the-allman-report/republican-candidate-hoping-to-potentially-challenge-mccaskill-talks-conservative-values …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if you don't believe in a god, you don't have rights? Just trying to understand this logic.
-
Of course you do, rights are part of your humanity. The point is they don't come from government.
-
I agree with that. However, I would argue laws are there to also protect those rights. Cannot exercise at expense of others.
-
How do laws about drug consumption or immigration protect your natural rights of life and liberty?
-
Depends on the law. But for what it's worth I'm all for drug legalization and open borders (especially if the welfare state is abolished).
-
Right some laws protect natural rights. Laws against murder and violence and theft and fraud. So that's like a 1/20th of them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
-
Hey Reseth: just because someone says something, that doesn't mean it's true. Duh.
-
Where did I say it was? Just pointing out that it's not "wild" or uncommon to say that.
-
Do you know what conversational implicature is, dummy?
-
Is it intentional that you would violate the cooperative principle while discussing conversational implicature? Now that's wild...
-
Yes. What do you have to counter?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.