This is SCOTUS discussing the fact that it, like other branches, needs to interpret Constitution to carry out a function (resolving a case).
-
-
Is he? If he interprets murder to be unconstitutional it should be good right?
-
Under your view he's fine till a court tells him he's wrong or Congress makes another law.. at which time.. at whim ..new interpretation.
-
Pres executes laws. Constitution is supreme law. He swears oath to uphold it. When it conflicts w/ other laws, he must follow Constitution.
-
Off to dinner. I disagree with how you have presented your position. Perhaps I've misunderstood. But I just don't see your position at all
-
President faces political consequences if his actions are not justified. As I've noted, neither view will constrain a tyrant. Take care.
-
I'll look more into this Kate's law, still believe sanctuary cities are hurting us. Glad to see you don't support Obama/trump care.
- 25 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Constitution and laws restrain the President. Not the other way round.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.