You are now quoting random portions of the opinion that have nothing to do with your proposition.
-
-
Under your View 'The Purge' could be made real at any time by Executive Fiat/Order.
-
In both views, there would be court challenge. But my view is more consistent w/ constitutional structure, sep'n of powers, and basic logic.
-
And the situation would remain until judicial review? which basically means until a new whim strikes. There is no check on power there.
-
Situation you describe is possible under either view. Tyrants don't care about laws. But your view requires a good pres to violate Const'n.
-
Is he? If he interprets murder to be unconstitutional it should be good right?
-
Under your view he's fine till a court tells him he's wrong or Congress makes another law.. at which time.. at whim ..new interpretation.
-
Pres executes laws. Constitution is supreme law. He swears oath to uphold it. When it conflicts w/ other laws, he must follow Constitution.
-
Off to dinner. I disagree with how you have presented your position. Perhaps I've misunderstood. But I just don't see your position at all
- 29 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He would have discretion for time it took to file via AG as I mentioned. He can't just say .. Nope !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.