No, that's not how laws work. That's like saying a 55 mph speed limit isn't 55 mph until someone challenges it in court and loses.
You do not understand judicial review if you think it's the principle that the judiciary is the sole arbiter of constitutionality.
-
-
SCOTUS is not final arbiter, either, except with respect to its functions. It interprets Constitution/laws in the course of resolving cases.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Exactly, which again goes to why our system of government requires that each branch independently interpret and uphold the Constitution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well it is also not State Nullification. While a State might be correct that is currently thought to be extra constitutional.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.