Come on... Please do research on the war powers act... President is Commander in Chief given brevity to act on circumstance... 1/2
-
-
-
You should carefully reread the War Powers Resolution.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1541 …
-
Sure, other people have already schooled you on this matter, no need to beat that horse anymore, move along
-
Actually, other people have realized they were wrong. Read the War Powers Resolution instead of repeating fake claims about its contents.
-
Yea,u assume ppls intelligence, but don't know I read it more than once as deployed in Iraq, so take ur condescension elsewhere, move along
-
Thanks for your service, but you misread it more than once.
-
Dude, people can disagree, it's called being an adult, leave me alone seriously, go screw with someone else
-
No problem. You're the one who initiated this conversation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Read the war powers statute then come talk to me.
-
I have. You might want to carefully read it again.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1541 …
-
I don't need to read it again. You're wrong.
-
Which section are you citing for your conclusion?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No Justin. COMMANDER AND CHIEF doesn't need CONgressional approval to be COMMANDER AND CHIEF...?
-
Article I, §8: Congress shall have the power...pic.twitter.com/kmlQ7V3Ztr
-
War Powers Act of 73 gave POTUS 60 days of discretionary warmaking at his command (must "notify" Congress).
-
No, you are incorrect. Read the War Powers Resolution.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1541 …
-
Why has no POTUS ever been punished for exercising emergency combat option? No challenge b/c Congress afraid of SCOTUS striking down act.
-
SCOTUS will not decide a political question like this one.
-
That is absurd. They deal with all matters that are written in law.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.