No, I consistently uphold both. Courts don't opine on most laws. "Anything goes until SCOTUS opines" would threaten Rule of Law.
-
-
Replying to @justinamash
So explain how you uphold "rule of law" when you choose to not enforce laws that you personally feel are unconstitutional?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cabbageguy
"Rule of Law" means that the application and execution of laws should not be arbitrary.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @justinamash @cabbageguy
It's under your view that executive would act arbitrarily—unbound by Constitution except in rare cases where SCOTUS has opined.
3 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @virtueskeptic @cabbageguy
James Madison: "Each must in the exercise of its functions,...
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
... be guided by the text of the Constitution according to its own interpretation of it."
5 replies 4 retweets 5 likes
Justin Amash Retweeted Justin Amash
https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/835309506523451392 …https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/835342045682286595 …
Justin Amash added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.