Note that I held the same position when Pres. Obama was president: https://www.facebook.com/justinamash/posts/687388404633902 …https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/835144093223247873 …
-
-
Please answer my question.
-
Sorry for any misunderstanding. An unconstitutional law is unconstitutional the moment it is enacted. No court opinion required.
-
Sorry - but I strongly disagree - courts decide this after a law is enacted - your position is dangerous to the rule of law
-
No, you are not correct. We swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution. This is precisely how the Framers designed it.
-
Courts simply interpret Constitution and laws in course of deciding particular cases between specific parties.
-
So we get our own interpretation as to what is Constitutional & we can go by what we believe over the court's interpretation?
-
Each branch is responsible for upholding Constitution. If an actual case between specific parties arises, then court resolves.
-
So you are clearly not a "rule of law" guy - working in a body that makes laws - this is difficult to reconcile
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Lewis4Hope@cabbageguy YES! Remember this? Lots of rolling going on in graves...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly! Legislators should absolutely consider Constitutionality of bills they vote on.pic.twitter.com/Q1fyo8ErbI
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is an incredibly disturbing response from a constitution/rule of law person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.