It's not lawful to ban immigrants b/c of "nationality, place of birth, or place of residence." This 1965 law limits 1952 law Trump cites.https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/825798234861862912 …
-
-
Might be time for a Republican representative to join an airport protest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@justinamash Congressman, it is you who is cherry picking the law. Read and learn, sir.#Trump EOhttp://www.nationalreview.com/article/444371/donald-trump-executive-order-ban-entry-seven-muslim-majority-countries-legal … -
Wrong. This argument will not hold up in the courts. Have fun.
-
Argument? Those are Supreme Court decisions. Have fun in your personal state of denial.
-
Have fun destroying the values of the country you supposedly fought for. You people are ISIS's best assets.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
not a permanent ban.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A reread of United States Code, 2006 Edition, Supplement 5, Title 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can congress not overrule his executive order?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and the very first section… can’t discriminate based on “[…] nationality, place of birth, or place of residence"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a free shot on Trump Corp... please use it.pic.twitter.com/Yyhh0Xc07l
-
this is ridiculous. He used the Obama admin list of nations.
-
Funny how being a bat shit crazy racist crook can work against you on the trust thing, eh?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.