What does @justinamash mean that religious liberty “cannot be used as a metric” when taxpayer money is involved?http://dailysign.al/1ZuKbi5
-
-
Replying to @WaylanOwens
See the attached excerpts and read more here: https://m.facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/1089398081099597 ….pic.twitter.com/oCSejzQN0O
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
Read. Shocked you equate gender identity protections to 1st Amendment protections for religion.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @WaylanOwens
Do you think a Christian should be allowed to employ only Christians at a secular business?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @justinamash
.
@justinamash Do you equate gender identity with religion as equal in claim to protection under the Constitution?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @justinamash
You argue on FB for GI protections on the basis of relig protections. Pls advise why my view on employ affects your argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WaylanOwens
Does religious liberty include right to employ someone only from your own religion? This is relevant to meaning of the phrase.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
Defining relig lib outstrips Twitter. Less govt coercion better. In general, no. In practice, free exercise includes workplace.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Heritage should be upset about this aspect if concern is genuine, but silence. I agree with you that less coercion is better.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.