Really, @justinamash? I hadn't pegged you as a squish. http://dailysign.al/20KOLsL via @ryantand
-
-
Yes, that would be better, so why is expanding requirements more libertarian than leaving as is?
-
I'm strongly Rule of Law-oriented. Since I can't fix whole system (Epstein), I favored equality/consistency.
@TiffanyHBates -
so make statist system consistently statist...
-
Nothing more statist than arbitrariness in law. My philosophy is Hayekian. He too was criticized for RoL focus.
@TiffanyHBates -
You can’t have Rule of Law with “gender identity” Can you define it? How does it apply to bathrooms pronouns?
@AustinLipari -
Hayek wouldn't have stood for undefinable terms
@AustinLipari -
If you take a moment to read it, you'll see that the amendment is not about bathrooms or pronouns.
@AustinLipari -
It's about "gender identity" "discrimination" Can you define those terms? Explain how they apply to bathrooms?
@AustinLipari - 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.