Really, @justinamash? I hadn't pegged you as a squish. http://dailysign.al/20KOLsL via @ryantand
No, he actually makes reasonable points that I agree with. But his alternative is not on the table right now. @TiffanyHBates
-
-
isn't the alternative not ratifying the executive order?
-
No. His preferred alternative is lifting all requirements, not just LGBT. Would at least be consistent policy.
@TiffanyHBates -
Yes, that would be better, so why is expanding requirements more libertarian than leaving as is?
-
I'm strongly Rule of Law-oriented. Since I can't fix whole system (Epstein), I favored equality/consistency.
@TiffanyHBates -
so make statist system consistently statist...
-
Nothing more statist than arbitrariness in law. My philosophy is Hayekian. He too was criticized for RoL focus.
@TiffanyHBates -
You can’t have Rule of Law with “gender identity” Can you define it? How does it apply to bathrooms pronouns?
@AustinLipari -
Hayek wouldn't have stood for undefinable terms
@AustinLipari - 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.