Here I discuss the cancelled Trump rally and my minor disagreement with @justinamash over freedom of speech: http://ariarmstrong.com/2016/03/trump-cruz-and-freedom-of-speech/ …
-
-
.
@justinamash Ok then I think we really are in substantive agreement.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash@ariarmstrong Freedom of speech implies freedom from forcible interference w/speech, from any source. 1A bars gov interference -
@evanbernick Natural rights not ordinarily described as "freedom of." Constitution includes phrase bc of relationship to govt.@ariarmstrong -
@justinamash@ariarmstrong Thus, Patrick Henry referred to "freedom of press" as among "the rights of human nature" 2/2 -
@evanbernick We are arguing semantics. My point is that the phrase "freedom of" is misleading in non-government context.@ariarmstrong -
@justinamash@ariarmstrong Freedom of speech in 1A is a natural right, but it's specifically protected against gov (hence, "no law").
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.