This isn't a constitutional Q; it's a political Q. The Senate should do whatever it thinks is best for the country.https://twitter.com/adamjepstein/status/699283484217626624 …
-
-
@justinamash If Senate leaders refuse to vote on *any* nominee - can't be viewed as advice to nom diff person. Thus, Constitutional Q. -
@adamjepstein Still political Q. I think Senate should evaluate one by one, even though not constitutionally required to vote in each case. -
@justinamash yes, required to "evaluate" one by one. Blanket refusal to give advice/consent on *any* nom = dereliction of Const. duty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash appreciate the dialogue, btw - MichLaw '98Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.