@TBerriman57 There should not be a double standard for self-defense. If anything, police should be more reluctant to use deadly force.
-
-
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash in a perfect world, yes. But it's not. The ambushing and entrapment of LEOs has directly contributed to these incidents.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TNigel57
@TBerriman57 This is about our Constitution (2nd, 4th & 5th Amendments). You sign up to protect public; unfortunately, that involves risks.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash and when you wave guns around in public or attack a police officer, that too involved risks.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @TNigel57
@TBerriman57 I agree, but the Constitution protects individuals who behave badly just as it protects the good and innocent.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash Treat the good the same as the evil? In a war zone, they'd be heroes. Here?We villainize some of them them for doing their job1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @TNigel57
@TBerriman57 If you don't like our Constitution, you can try to amend it or move to another country where rights are arbitrarily protected.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @TNigel57
@TBerriman57 There's a third choice: You can accept that the Constitution protects rights, which makes policing more challenging in the U.S.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash what also makes policing challenging is that individuals do not respect the basic rights of others. Like assaulting LEOs.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.