.@justinamash @antiwar1984 there is no limitation in the 4th amendment to only U.S. citizens!
-
New conversation
-
-
-
@justinamash@DPrabhata Congressman shouldn't be having confidential conversations with foreign leaders. That's an executive branch functionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash Ha ha, US Congressmen lose their privacy too. It may be against US 4th Amendment, but Congress made it legal.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash Actually, Obama's TSA is practicing impeachable offenses. How long till Congress acts.?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash@DPrabhata congress deserve taste of own medicine (realizing Mr Amash fought the good fight)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash@catoletters Yes, I'd like to know why the#NSA thinks your 4th amendment rights end when you talk to a foreigner.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash@AlexanderAbdo@DPrabhata no according to the U.S. Attorney's officeses. No 4th amend beyond U.S. Borders -
@Cosmos996@justinamash@AlexanderAbdo If a call 2 Dear Leader in North Korea is not protected by 4th Amendment, It should be same 4 Bibi 2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@justinamash#YesMaam#YourCellPhone#YourCellPhone#YourCellPhone@HenryCoPolice soooo disappointed to find 15 friends &#TheGyno@308saiga
New conversation -
-
-
@justinamash Normally, I agree. But intercepts from TSA are now on Congress. This is scary.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash Thank you 4 the correction. I thought that a US Congressman should not discuss its business w/foreign official.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash@catoletters And you wouldn't have to explain something that simple to a US citizen if they learned a fucking thing in school. -
@Angry_Husky Congressman shouldn't be having confidential conversations with foreign leaders. That's an executive branch function. -
@Poppie2015 If you don't like the Constitution, then change it. There's a process for that. Otherwise, get a warrant. It's that simple. -
@Angry_Husky According to the constitution, the executive branch represents the U.S. to foreign governments. Congress does not. -
@Poppie2015 Straw man much? This is about NSA spying. Regardless of circumstances, to spy on Americans, NSA needs a warrant, The end. -
@Angry_Husky Spying was on others. Congressmen were incidental. It is president's role to represent US to foreign leaders, NOT Congress.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.