@justinamash then why shouldn't she own a trademark on 1989? @KDVR
-
-
Replying to @ProofofUse
@ProofofUse If she wants to trademark "1989" logo, that's certainly okay. Number itself is too generic. "No" was my reply to headline.@KDVR1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash Generic for what? There are many trademarks for numbers/years: MJ's 23 http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=75778238&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch … GAP 1969 http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=85009864&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch …1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @ProofofUse
Proof of Use Retweeted Proof of Use
@justinamash Common words, numbers, symbols, etc can be trademarks. That doesn't mean the public can't use them. Seehttps://twitter.com/ProofofUse/status/519291412421292033 …Proof of Use added,
Proof of Use @ProofofUseWHO http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=74025988&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch … WHAT http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77046918&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch … WHERE http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77329265&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch … WHEN http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=73837365&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch … WHY http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=78377803&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch …1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ProofofUse
@ProofofUse Well, then you agree with me. Everyone knows that characters and symbols can be trademarked for specific uses/contexts. So what?1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash I don't agree with you. A year/number can also be a trademark. It isn't generic. You don't seem to know that or understand why.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ProofofUse
@ProofofUse Years/numbers consist of characters. I'm beginning to think that you don't understand trademark law or you just like arguing.1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @justinamash
Actually,
@justinamash, I can vouch for@ProofofUse. He understands#trademarks quite well. So far he's winning this argument. Quite well.2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @RonColeman
@RonColeman@ProofofUse She can trademark "1989" logo and "1989" for specific uses/contexts. What's the disagreement?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @justinamash
@justinamash@ProofofUse Well I disagree that anyone can "trademark" anything.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@RonColeman @ProofofUse Anything besides my using trademark as a verb?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.