Consistent with my oath to support and defend the Constitution, I must oppose this nuclear deal. https://www.facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/948120658560674 …
-
-
@justinamash See, when most people break out "rule of law" I saw laws need to be respectable before I respect them. (They're usually cons.)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@justinamash War is the most important issue (followed by criminal justice) because you can't bring back dead. So ends in antiwar trump all. -
@LucyStag@justinamash I don't think Justin is going to vote for war anytime soon, hopefully. -
@Quinnyyy72@justinamash I'm still going to assume and hope that is so. Just trying to explain the stakes are highest in war issues. -
@LucyStag are there not any provisions in the agreement that may lead to war? this isn't black and white as if agreement is 100% good or bad
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@justinamash@LucyStag i have a question on constitution. Based on article 6 of US constition, NPT is the "supreme law of the land", right? -
@justinamash@LucyStag if so, the based on article iv of npt us can not deny iran nuclear technology. http://m.state.gov/md16281.htm -
@justinamash@LucyStag 1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty -
@justinamash@LucyStag ...to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination... -
@justinamash@LucyStag iran voluntarily promised not to get nuclear weapons in exchange for US promise to help it develop nuclear technology -
@justinamash@LucyStag so congressmen who deny iran nuclear tech are breaking "supreme law of the land"? Where is the flaw in my logic?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.