Rather than switch to "independent" commission system, why not require legislative supermajority for redistricting?https://twitter.com/abettermi/status/630404255577415680 …
@JohnAvlon Michigan's current system is simple majority, which makes collusion easier.
-
-
Yes, that's worse. But independent commissions are best at removing collusion. 90% safe seats would receive super majority.
@justinamash -
@JohnAvlon I'm not convinced an independent commission is less prone to collusion (or other malfeasance) than a legislative supermajority. -
Evidence suggests otherwise - Independently Drawn Districts Have Proved to Be More Competitive http://nyti.ms/1GZ80q9 -
@justinamash -
@JohnAvlon For comparison, do any states require a legislative supermajority? -
Not that I’m aware of - cc’ing
@BrennanCenter - but why be skeptical if we know what works?@justinamash -
@JohnAvlon Skepticism and experimentation help us determine what works best. -
Yes, definitely - but, again, experience and data-driven results can drive decisions rather than endless partisan debate.
@justinamash
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@justinamash speaking collusion: will you call for cindy gamrat to resignThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.