It's unfortunate that it's gotten to the point where I have to thank the President for following the Constitution & the law.
-
-
“
@repjustinamash:@spudchapp You might want to read the Constitution & War Powers Resolution.” And This!!!:pic.twitter.com/2BAGDkvfLZ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@repjustinamash -------->@spudchapp buying the immediate danger to the US? That's just silly! -
@Wilbs999@repjustinamash no, I don't believe there is but I resent right wingers making unfounded statements for their political agenda. -
@spudchapp the truth is,#Potus cannot act unless the US IS under imminent threat. So, he had no authority here.@repjustinamash -
@Wilbs999@repjustinamash under your theory, every drone attack is unconstitutional. Is it a crime to lie about WMD in Iraq to start a war? -
@spudchapp You ARE a left winger! I have a cartoon for you! http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yAyCdfOXvec&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DyAyCdfOXvec …@repjustinamash
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@repjustinamash@spudchapp@undergroundprof@Wilbs999 Is it about Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 War Powers Clause, vests in the Congress? -
@chiyenchendra yes. But the War Powers Act (FDR) gives#POTUS authority when US is under imminent threat.@spudchapp@undergroundprof -
@Wilbs999 So FDR is the first president, who undermine constitution.@spudchapp@undergroundprof -
@chiyenchendra No, there were many earlier underminings, not related necessarily to War Powers.@spudchapp@undergroundprof
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@repjustinamash it's not in dispute. I don't support an attack on Syria but this type of attack does not need congressional approval. -
@spudchapp It would violate multi-lateral treaties, which would violate the Constitution.@repjustinamash
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.